|
NASD Enforcement Activity
Accommodation Forgery
Mark Koerner, Regional Counsel for Enforcement, NASD, spoke on current
enforcement issues for the NASD at the Mesirow Financial B/D and IA
Services 2005 Conference which recently was held at Wyndham Hotel
in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Koerner's thoughtful discussion regarding
enforcement included
the current enforcement environment and the violations that have the
focus of the enforcement staff at the NASD. While the violations
obviously include theft and conversion, selling away, net capital
violations and various sales practice issues related to the sale of
various products, including variables and mutual funds, and the related
supervision issues, a surprising observation was made regarding the
increase in accommodation forgery cases. These cases currently
represent approximately 10% of the enforcement activity of the NASD.
Accommodation forgery
generally occurs where a registered representative signs client documentation,
on behalf of a client, with the verbal consent of the client. It
was speculated that this trend is probably related to the substantial
increase in the amount of paperwork that is required to open an account
and or address the disclosure requirements of certain products. To
that end, the majority of these cases generally occur when a client
fails to sign one of any number of documents, and with the verbal
consent of the client, the registered representative signs "on
behalf of the client".
Ultimately, while
representing a serious regulatory violation, these are not cases the
NASD enjoys prosecuting, since they are usually against registered
representatives with little or no customer complaint or disciplinary
history, and the violations appear on the surface to fall within the
concept of no harm no foul. However, the violation is clearly
serious from a regulatory aspect, and historically results in minimum
sanctions of $5,000.00 fines and suspensions of 20 days.
As a result of this
trend, it is recommended that firms review the new account documentation
process and assure that those charged with supervision of the sales
force take steps to remind their sales force of the significant regulatory
exposure that can result from signing client documentation based upon
a verbal consent of clients. |
|